Emimlio Juan Brignardello Vela
Emilio Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros, se especializa en brindar asesoramiento y gestión comercial en el ámbito de seguros y reclamaciones por siniestros para destacadas empresas en el mercado peruano e internacional.
In a significant development for early breast cancer treatment, recent studies presented at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium have indicated that certain surgical interventions may not be necessary for some patients. This finding could reshape the landscape of breast cancer treatment, particularly for those with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and early-stage tumors. DCIS, a condition affecting roughly 50,000 women in the U.S. each year, involves the abnormal growth of cells in the milk ducts while leaving surrounding breast tissue unharmed. Traditionally, many women have opted for surgery to remove the affected tissue; however, studies suggest that a more conservative approach—active monitoring—may be a viable and safe alternative for a significant number of patients. One of the studies, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, followed over 950 women diagnosed with low-risk DCIS. These women were randomly assigned to either undergo surgery or participate in a monitoring program that involved regular mammograms and the option for surgery if their condition changed. After two years, the rates of invasive cancer remained low across both groups, with around 6% in the surgical cohort and 4% among those who were monitored. This data suggests that many women may be able to forgo immediate surgery without increasing their risk of cancer progression. Tina Clark, a participant in the study, shared her experience of being able to avoid surgery while managing her personal life, including caring for a teenage nephew and coping with the loss of her husband. She emphasized the importance of understanding one's options when facing a diagnosis of low-risk DCIS, highlighting the value of the monitoring approach. In addition to DCIS, another study explored the necessity of sentinel lymph node biopsies, a common procedure in which lymph nodes are removed to assess cancer spread. This practice, while informative, can lead to complications such as chronic pain and swelling. The German study revealed that in cases of early breast cancer where patients were undergoing breast-conserving surgery, the removal of lymph nodes did not significantly impact survival rates. After five years, both groups—those who had lymph nodes removed and those who did not—demonstrated similar survival rates, suggesting that many women could potentially avoid this invasive procedure. Experts in the field are optimistic yet cautious about these findings. Dr. Virginia Kaklamani from the University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio acknowledged the potential for overtreatment in cases of DCIS and supported the study's implications for patient care. However, Dr. Monica Morrow from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center urged for longer follow-up periods before drawing definitive conclusions, emphasizing that ongoing research is essential to ensure patient safety. Both studies underscore a pivotal shift in the perception of treatment for early-stage breast cancer, advocating for personalized approaches that prioritize patient quality of life while managing cancer risks. As research continues, these findings could empower women diagnosed with early breast cancer, providing them with more options and potentially reducing the physical and emotional burdens of treatment.